Trump seems to be able to court controversy with consumate ease as illustrated by his latest vague comments about the Second Amendment holding the key to obstructing Hilary Clinton's (potential) influence over the Supreme Court. Many commentators have interpreted Trump's comments as suggesting the 'arms' (as in the 'right to hold and carry arms') might resolve what Trump saw as a problem. Does this mean that he supports the individuals right to do violence to anyone they disagree with or object to? And would Trump take the same stance with other peoples or governments with whom he disagreed, should he be elected to the Oval Office? No wonder some Republicans are supporting Hilary.